Supreme Court asked to Stop Second Ohio Execution
The attorney for the Ohio inmate whose execution failed last week has asked the Supreme Court to halt the second execution, scheduled for Tuesday. The first execution was halted after two hours, because authorities failed to find a usable vein. The inmate Romell Broom was granted one week’s reprieve, but his lawyer argued that he had suffered extreme mental and physical trauma and should at least be granted extra time, at best a pardon. Broom was stuck with the hypodermic needle at least eighteen times.
Broom’s lawyer argued that a second execution attempt was unconstitutional, as it would violate his civil rights. The inmate, who was convicted in 1984 for the rape and murder of a fourteen-year-old girl, reportedly told his brother on the phone that he was “ready to die” a few days before the initial execution.
Related posts:
- Ohio Inmate Traumatized After Failed Execution The lawyer of an Ohio inmate said that trying to...
- Ohio Fails to Find Doctors to Provide Execution Advice The state of Ohio is having a difficult time finding...
- Ohio Murderer Appeals Execution A condemned murderer is scheduled to be the first person...
- Court Examines Ohio’s Injection Procedures The failed execution of the Ohio inmate has caused a...
- Supreme Court Worried About Stifling Prosecutors The Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared worried that allowing a...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Comments
One Response to “Supreme Court asked to Stop Second Ohio Execution”Trackbacks
Check out what others are saying about this post...[...] failed execution of the Ohio inmate has caused a tremendous stir in the nation’s justice and corrections system – his [...]